many years ago (over 35) I worked in a fully "computerized" plant, where operators interface with th system through UMMI's (crt+keyboard) to operate the different functions of the plant. The digital computer ran a UNIX system and had 64K, yes 64K!! To ke3p the folks running the plant focused on their part of the task, I put a sign over the computer room that read "this machine has no brain, use your own" I think that we are falling into the same fallacy with AI. AI is a TOOL, not a brain, and it still relies on data input to generate responses, and like my FORTRAN teacher ( giving my age with this) used to say, GIGO, and I'm sure you know what this means. So do not give up the autonomy of your decisions, to a machine, just use it to give you the data to make your decisions, not to replace them.
many years ago (over 35) I worked in a fully "computerized" plant, where operators interface with th system through UMMI's (crt+keyboard) to operate the different functions of the plant. The digital computer ran a UNIX system and had 64K, yes 64K!! To ke3p the folks running the plant focused on their part of the task, I put a sign over the computer room that read "this machine has no brain, use your own" I think that we are falling into the same fallacy with AI. AI is a TOOL, not a brain, and it still relies on data input to generate responses, and like my FORTRAN teacher ( giving my age with this) used to say, GIGO, and I'm sure you know what this means. So do not give up the autonomy of your decisions, to a machine, just use it to give you the data to make your decisions, not to replace them.